Article

Cloud Security: Understanding SOC 2 Type 2 Attestations

Topic: Business NetworkingBy Michael PetersPublished Recently added

Legacy signals

Legacy popularity: 1,009 legacy views

We are living in a cloud-first world; cloud services, including storage services and SaaS providers, are wildly popular. Unfortunately, third-party vendor breaches are at epidemic levels, and new regulations such as the EU GDPR are seeking to hold organizations accountable if third-party business associates that store or handle their sensitive data, including their cloud vendors, are hacked. One way for businesses to protect themselves is to look for an SOC 2 Type 2 report when evaluating cloud vendors. While cloud vendors are embracing the SOC 2 Type 2 to demonstrate their commitment to data integrity and security, many client organizations are still unfamiliar with this important audit standard. What is an SOC 2 Report? The SOC 2 is part of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) SOC reporting framework and utilizes the AT-101 professional standard. Unlike the SOC 1, which focuses on financial reporting controls, the SOC 2 documents service organizations’ non-financial reporting controls. It was specifically designed for to address the needs of service organizations that store customer data in the cloud, including SaaS providers. SOC 2 attestations are based on AICPA’s Trust Service Principles of Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, and Privacy. Reporting organizations are not required to address each one of the Trust Service Principles; SOC 2 reports can be limited to the principles that are relevant to the services being provided. AICPA’s principles of Security attest that the organization protects information and systems against unauthorized access, information disclosure, and damage; and Privacy, which attests that the service organization collects, uses, retains, discloses, and disposes of personal information properly. Type 1 vs. Type 2 There are two types of SOC 2 reports, Type 1 and Type 2. When evaluating a cloud vendor, always look for a Type 2. While a Type 1 audit provides a snapshot of an organization’s controls at a point in time, a Type 2 audit examines them over a specified period. The Type 1 is, thus, only preliminary to the Type 2. An SOC 2 Type 1 demonstrates that the provider has controls in place but has not yet audited them. A Type 2 demonstrates that they have tested the controls over a period of time and proven that they work. SOC 2 Type 2 reports benefit both cloud vendors and their clients. Client organizations can rest assured knowing that their cloud vendors’ controls meet the highest standards of data governance and security. Cloud vendors are able to differentiate themselves in a crowded marketplace and enjoy their own peace of mind, knowing that they have proactive data governance and cyber security controls in place to protect their systems and their clients’ data. While SOC 2 audits are time-consuming and rigorous, GRC automation technologies can make the process take far less time and go far more smoothly.

Article author

About the Author

Michael Peters is the CEO of Lazarus Alliance, Inc., the Proactive Cyber Security™ firm, and Continuum GRC. He has served as an independent information security consultant, executive, researcher, and author. He is an internationally recognized and awarded security expert with years of IT and business leadership experience and many previous executive leadership positions. He has contributed significantly to curriculum development for graduate degree programs in information security, advanced technology, cyberspace law, and privacy, and to industry standard professional certifications. He has been featured in many publications and broadcast media outlets as the “Go-to Guy” for executive leadership, information security, cyberspace law, and governance.

Further reading

Further Reading

4 total

Article

We are living in a day and age where learning new things have never been more natural. As time passes, the final barriers to learning are being taken care of. We have moved from traditional classroom settings to e-learning and are now one step ahead of mLea ing. As almost all the content on the web is accessed via mobile, it is surprising that eLea ing mobile app have generated much buzz in the industry. <img src="https://i.pinimg.com/564x/d9/ea/f3/d9eaf3cce33d4c52033b7b8114e3efa7.jpg" width="450" height="300">

Related piece

Article

The modern software development industry has been greatly influenced by JavaScript language and artificial intelligence in recent times. According to a Gartner study, in 2019 it, total global spending on the IT sector is expected to cross $ 3.8 trillion; an increase of 3.2% over the previous year’s spending. In this scenario, the demand for full-stack developers will be high not only in the coming years but also for many years to come.

Related piece

Article

The app economy is a competitive landscape. The barriers to entry are extremely low when compared to traditional industries, and the potential rewards for being a popular app are high, such that every mobile app development company wants to create a significant ripple in the market and go viral.

Related piece

Article

There is a mobile app for almost everything in life now. Human beings spend more time on mobile than any other daily activities and a vast majority of this time is spent on mobile apps. Mobile apps make a multi-billion dollar industry now. Naturally, for deserving developers, the thriving industry presents a grand career opportunity in terms of earning potential, growth and recognition. There are too many career paths in the IT industry today, but none really equals the career opportunity with mobile apps.

Related piece