Article

Romanticizing Food

Topic: Drug and Substance AbuseBy Laura Katleman-PruePublished Recently added

Legacy signals

Legacy popularity: 2,128 legacy views

Ignoring your mind is simple, but not easy. Why—because as human beings we are programmed to pay attention to and believe our thoughts. A stressful thought pops into our head and faster than the speed of light, the mind lays out reams of proof about why this painful distillation of life is true.

Here is the bottom line:

If you believe your stressful thoughts, you suffer.
If you believe your romantic thoughts about food, you follow them to the refrigerator, and put on weight.
I know you don’t court a plate of chocolate chip cookies, but that doesn’t stop you from lusting after food in your mind. Consciously you know that food can’t really curl up with you at night and make you feel loved, but somewhere deep down you believe that it is your most coveted source of pleasure.

Romanticizing food means fantasizing about it, imbuing it with qualities and powers that it doesn’t possess, or fixating on the pleasurable aspect of eating it. It can’t give you unending pleasure, make you happy when you’re sad, or comfort you when you’re lonely, relieve your stress, revive you when you feel tired, or re-ignite your joie de vivre when you feel listless or bored.

When you imagine that food has anything to offer you other than nice tasting nutrition, you can find yourself eating for the wrong reasons and gaining weight. If you’re eating solely for pleasure rather than nutrition, eating emotionally, entertaining yourself with food, or imagining what food will taste like, you’re romanticizing food.

If you are in the habit of asking yourself,

“What would I like to eat?”

or

“What taste would I like to have in my mouth?”

Rather than,

“What could my body could use nutritionally?” you’re romanticizing food.

Romanticizing food is a way of deluding yourself by playing “let’s pretend.” Let’s pretend that I can change my unpleasant experience into a pleasant one through food. It is magical thinking that only tells part of the truth and leaves out the bloating, shame, guilt, listlessness, ill-health, and possible weight gain that come with eating too much comfort food. It’s like picking up a coin and thinking you can keep the heads side without the tails side.

Ultimately, healing your relationship with food is about withdrawing your romantic projections from it. When you do this, you are able to see the whole truth of it—all at once. Food, when used in ways that it was never intended, it is a source of pain as well as pleasure. If come to see food’s primary function as meeting the nutritional needs of the body, rather than as a source of comfort or entertainment, or distraction, ultimately, you will stop suffering over food. The reward for this shift in your relationship with food is: a slimmer, healthier body that is yours to keep for the rest of your life without worry or struggle.

Article author

About the Author

Laura Katleman-Prue is a graduate of the Theravision Institute for Transpersonal Psychology in Boston. She has been teaching meditation and self-inquiry since 2007, and has successfully counseled people about eating issues. Laura’s Skinny Thinking approach grew out of her desire to heal the weight issues that plagued her for 35 years. She discovered that changing her diet was irrelevant if she didn’t also change her thinking habits. By teaching herself to go on a “thought diet” and transforming her relationship with food, she experienced permanent healing, which ultimately motivated her to write Skinny Thinking in order to help others with their eating issues. www.skinnythinking.com

Further reading

Further Reading

4 total

Article

What is alchemy? Many of us are drawn to the mysteries of the past to enlighten the quality of the present. Mythology, astrology, the tarot, runes, and I-Ching have drawn the interest of many in recent years, and is being enjoyed and utilized in fresh and innovative ways. Ancient wisdom imbued ...

Related piece

Article

The difference between a psychopath and a sociopath is blurred, at least according to the fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). The DSM-IV lists both definitions together under the heading of Antisocial Personalities because they share common traits. ...

Related piece

Article

Sigmund Freud When I think of Freud in relation to addictive behavior, the id, ego, and superego come to mind. The id is hedonistic--sleazy, fun-loving and pleasure seeking. The id says, "John, use that money to buy bag of dope and then share it with her. You'll surely get laid for your ...

Related piece

Article

Chemical dependency has been beaten like a dead horse. There are causal theories from genetic predisposition to various theories of learning, which has contributed greatly to a social construction of reality--a clearing that needs to be re-visioned. Discussed here will be psychological and depth ...

Related piece