Article

The Art and Skill of Decision Making

Topic: Management SkillsBy Julia Hill-NicholsPublished Recently added

Legacy signals

Legacy popularity: 1,288 legacy views

Legacy rating: 2.7/5 from 3 archived votes

It was late one afte
oon and I was on a conference call with an executive who had recently left his company. He was a good leader – competent, hardworking, with a solid track record. We were in the midst of completing a cultural analysis to determine the type of company culture for which he would be best suited. The executive wanted to be sure not to find himself in the same situation as his past job going forward.

It had been a good conversation. He was thoughtful and articulate. We began discussing the topic of decision making, taking a look at previous companies and what the ideal company would look like. The energy of the conversation suddenly rose exponentially. “That was the problem – that was my biggest frustration! That’s what drove my increased avoidance with the leadership team, my growing lack of engagement. We just couldn’t make a decision. When we did it took forever and within weeks what had been decided was virtually undecided by either passive-aggressive behavior or complete lack of execution.”

The ability to make decisions that are timely, based on relevant facts and are supported by action is a fundamental skill for any team, but most importantly for a leadership team. The skill of efficiently making a decision however isn’t something that just materializes for people. There are basic building blocks that must be in place to support a person’s ability to make these decisions. Starting with trust and adding dialogue is a good place to begin. Let’s take a look at the definition of both.
Trust – a firm belief that a person or thing may be relied upon; confident expectation, firm belief or confidence in the honesty, integrity, reliability, justice, etc. of another person or thing.
Dialogue – conversation, discussion between representatives, versus a monologue defined as a long speech by one person.

As many of you know, I am a big fan of Patrick Lencioni. In his book, The Five Dysfunctions of a Team, he describes characteristics of teams that have built trust. Among them are:

Take risks in offering feedback and assistancer
Focus time and energy on important issues, not politicsr
Accept questions and input about their areas of responsibility

Each of these characteristics conce
ing trust can be accomplished through dialogue. Conversations that are composed of both listening for understanding and dialogue to communicate critical data are the most effective routes that will lead to the capability of making and sticking to the best possible decisions for the company. If you find yourself in a meeting that is dominated by a series of monologues the chance of you reaching the best, executable decision will be greatly minimized.
The next time your team is in the process of making a decision, ask yourself these questions:

Did we have the pertinent facts needed to make the decision?
Did everyone weigh in?
Was there a healthy debate?
Did we understand what was at risk?
Did we assign responsibility to carry out the decision?

Once you have clarified the criteria needed to make a solid decision through dialogue, trust your team to make the decision and empower them to execute.

Article author

About the Author

Julia Hill-Nichols, SPHR, is the founder of LeadersCove, LLC. With over 30 years experience in operations and human capital management, Julia is gifted in the art and science of bridging strategic imperatives and a company’s human capabilities—executing for success, meeting bottom-line objectives and enlivening the people who are the organization’s lifeblood.

She has held the role of Senior Vice President, Human Resources for a Fortune 500 company, midsize companies and software start-ups. Much of her experience has been in the software, financial and insurance industries, representing significant merger, acquisition and divestiture activities.In addition, Julia is certified to administer the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, Step I and II, the OPTM360 and the Denison Organizational Cultural Assessment.

Throughout her professional career, Julia has acted as an internal consultant to executive leadership teams, managers and emerging leaders as they strive to build successful companies, bringing out the very best in all staff.

Further reading

Further Reading

4 total

Article

My business gives me the opportunity to work with many wonderful people as a client and as a supplier of services. Some time back however, I found myself doubting. I have been doubting other people and their integrity. I found myself in the position where I was filtering all my interactions through the polarising lens of a few souring experiences. In this space and sense of doubting others I had felt unable to create words or metaphors which could possibly be of service to you. So what changed? Frankly, Brett Godfrey did.

Related piece

Article

In the last week I have worked with 2 different people who are struggling to get their message across. They each have an idea and are being blocked by another persons’ apparent stubbornness. In each case when they analysed what was happening they discovered that the other person was not in fact being stubborn, but they were reacting emotionally to an inexpertly delivered message. What to do if you are being blocked.

Related piece

Article

We cover the topic of Locus of Control in our Leadership programs, so it is 2nd nature for me to take full ownership for whatever outcomes I am creating in my life. After all why teach it if I am not living it? REcently I have had some events seemingly “happen to me” which rocked my belief in my own control over the results I get. Before I get on with that part of the story a short discussion on what exactly is Locus of Control and how can we use it…rnr

Related piece

Article

Several of my coaching clients have requested support with either time management or work life balance When we have a discovery conversation on their challenge there is generally much more to discuss on the topic of insufficient delegation. They're keeping excessive responsibilities, authority and duty to their and their company's detriment. Consequently they under perform at their own level. They hold themselves back or suffer from a lack of balance in their lives with too many hours at work.

Related piece